Source Document
consensus-persona-respawn AI-SELF-IMPROVEMENT.md
# Why consensus-persona-respawn Improves AI Decision Quality ## Meta reasoning: stack alignment `consensus-tools -> consensus-interact -> persona-generator -> persona-respawn` This skill closes the lifecycle gap: when personas degrade, governance should adapt rather than stagnate. --- ## Why this skill improves behavior 1. **Failure-informed replacement** New personas are seeded from ledger mistake patterns, not random refresh. 2. **Controlled evolution** Persona mutation is explicit, versioned, and auditable. 3. **Anti-stagnation mechanism** Dead/low-reputation personas are replaced before they degrade decision quality. 4. **Continuity with adaptation** Role slot persists while behavior profile is improved. 5. **Replayable learning narrative** Respawn artifacts capture why and how changes were made. --- ## Self-improvement role This is the governance equivalent of model maintenance: evaluator quality is monitored and refreshed from observed error modes. --- ## Integration metadata - **Prerequisite**: persona_set artifact history via consensus-interact flows - **State substrate**: consensus-tools decisions + persona artifacts - **Primary output**: `persona_respawn` + updated `persona_set` - **Primary benefit**: adaptive evaluator evolution with auditability